TRICEPS TENDON INJURY – PER ASPERA AD ASTRA

Abstract

Background: Rupture of the triceps tendon is reported in the literature as the least common of all tendon injuries (Waugh RL, 1949). A review of the literature reveals that up to 50% of these injuries are misdiagnosed. It is also important to note that our understanding of the biology and healing processes of tendon injuries is still developing, particularly in comparison to other areas of musculoskeletal research (Citeroni MR, 2020). By furthering our knowledge of the relationships between mechanical and biological influences in the formation of healthy tendon tissue, we can gain insights that will aid in the effective treatment of acute and chronic tendon injuries. (Nourissat G, 2015).

Methods: The authors have conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of this injury, Subsequently, they compared this knowledge with their own experience of working at the University Hospital Bratislava. The incidence is comparable to that reported in the literature. In a retrospective analysis of the cohort over the last 10 years, more than half of the patients were managed conservatively. New surgical methods used in suture and fixation of the tendon to the olecranon ulna are also described. Knowledge of the basic principles, advantages and disadvantages of these methods assists the rehabilitation physician in developing an individual postoperative rehabilitation plan.

Conclusion: This paper represents the first comprehensive summary of this issue and will undoubtedly serve as an invaluable resource for practical decision-making regarding postoperative care options from the perspective of rehabilitation physicians.